07 - THE HUNS AND THE ALANS

The fairy tale of the Huns
A Hunok és Alánok története, válassza meg saját őseit!
The Hungarian Alanian archaeology of the Huns

The Huns did not leave any Hunnish archaeology in Carpathia, except cauldrons and cicadas, which both were rather Chinese than Mongolic! The archaeology of the Hsiung Nu was made of tigers tearing to pieces the Sacred Hungarian Stag and of non Hungarian pornographic stags. The gold artefact below, labelled Sarmatian by the Russians (probably made by Sarmatians!), is the evidence of the westernmost Xiung Nu/Hunnish archaeology (east of the Volga river): a Hunnish tiger, allied with a Chinese dragon, attack a sacred Hungarian Stag (war propaganda).
A Chino-Hunnish horde enslaved Hungarians of central Asia and of the kingdom of Alania (from Northern Caucasus to the Volga/Don rivers, UNESCO) and the Hunnish archaeology of the horde fails to arrive in Europe, replaced, west of the Volga, by Alanian archaeology, whose archetypes were in the Kingdom of Alania (Т. А. Габуев: 'Аланский всадник. Сокровища князей I-XII веков').

Cultural Anthropology says that the behaviour, the religion, the society, the art of the Xiungnu/Huns were the same as those of the Tongwancheng Mongols and of the Genghis Kan Mongols and that their culture was the opposite of the multimillennial matriarchal, egalitarian, peace loving, sedentary civilization of the Hungarians.
Had Atilla been Hungarian, he and his sons would have never killed their brothers, in order to become the new kings: that succession rule only applied to all the Mongols, including Atilla, the early Mogul (=Mongol) Dynasty, and Helian Bobo of Tongwancheng, ancestor of Borbála Obrusánszky. Atilla, Helian Bobo, and their sons, are described by Chinese and Roman Historians in exactly the same way! (see Wikipedia, 'Helian Bobo' as described by the Chinese Chronicles).
Who says that genetics confirms that the Huns were Hungarian is ignorant or says a lie.
The Huns likely came from Ordos, namely from Tongwancheng, where the Mongols had enslaved Chinese farmers, but not Hungarians. The only Hungarian found in a Xiung Nu cemetery, in Durling Naars, was R1a1a and carried Hungarian gold Sacred Symbols in his grave whose design had come from Székelyföld! A hired or enslaved gold smith does not make the Mongols Hungarian: it was a rule for the Mongols, all along their history, to hire foreigners as metal smiths or scientists in order to boost their 'low-tech'!
Who says that the Huns, including Atilla, were Hungarian is ignorant or says a lie. If you want to say that in the horde of Attila there were Hungarians you can; but you must call them by their name: Alanians of the Kingdom of Alania, ...and forget Attila and the Huns, who had enslaved your ancestors in Alan-liao (=Alania, in Chinese) and in Alania (Northern Caucasus)!
Who says that the Huns stayed in Hungary is ignorant or says a lie. The Mongolic Huns left Europe after the Mongolic army of Ellac was annihilated by Alans and Ostrogoths in Nedau and Debrecen. Only the Alans (and the Ostrogoths) remained in Europe and in Hungary (UNESCO). There are very little genetic traces of Huns in Hungary: there is even mathematical evidence of it:
Mathematical evidence that the Hunnish genetic admixture in Hungarians is... 0+%!

THE ALANS
History of Huns and Alans according to the Unesco
The Alans, according to the Encyclopedia Iranica
The Alans, according to the Ossetians
R2*: the probable genetic marker of the Alan migrations

The Alans were the largest tribe of Sarmatians (USSR archaeologists used the name Alans for the Sarmatians), whose being Hungarians is proved by:

• their agglutinative language with Iranian lexicon (V. I. Abaev): an agglutinative language cannot be Indo-European, regardless of its lexicon: lexicon is easily changed or contaminated, word by word, with time; but changing the agglutinative structure of a language requires a sudden entire language replacement, which did not occur!

• Lamberg-Karlovsky, Oxford University, maintains that "there is no evidence for the Scytho-Iranian theory of Abaev".

• their Hungarian archaeology in the Kingdom of Alania, which spread wherever they arrived (from Alania to Lithuania and to the Berber Queen Kahina. See pages 82-84 of the book "The 10,000 year Hungarian continuitas", the book "Аланский всадник. Сокровища князей I-XII веков", Т. А. Габуев, and the above "The Hungarian Alanian archaeology of the Huns"). The label "Ostrogothic" for that archaeology is another falsification of the Indo-Germanists! The Alans were the metal smiths of the Germanics and later on of Finns and Vikings (michelangelo.cn > "Finns Ainu").

• their Tamgas, which were Hungarian signs of identification (michelangelo.cn > "Tamga").

• their being blond (Ammianus Marcellinus)

• their cultural Anthropology

• and by their genetics (See michelangelo.cn > Genetics > Hungarian genetics > Sarmatia), and by their R2 (see above).

The only difference between the Magyars and the Parthian>Sarmatians>Avars was that the Magyars had lived in a weapon free Tarim basin, protected by Chinese troops, and the Parthian>Sarmatians>Avars had lived in an Indo-Iranian environment that had obliged them to become warriors for their survival. The presence of Sarmatians/Avars in Carpathia and in Magyars made possible "the Hungarian invasion of Europe" in the first 50 years of the Magyar history: the Magyars were used to ride camels, the Sarmatians/Avars to hit and run!
ALAN MIGRATIONS (confirmed by history et alia and by genetics):